Gary Hamel has written an interesting
post in which he refers to a global workforce survey by Towers Perrin-
"Consider the recent “Global Workforce Survey” conducted by Towers Perrin, an HR consultancy. In an attempt to measure the extent of employee engagement around the world, the company polled more than 90,000 workers in 18 countries. The survey covered many of the key factors that determine workplace engagement, including: the ability to participate in decision-making, the encouragement given for innovative thinking, the availability of skill-enhancing job assignments and the interest shown by senior executives in employee well-being.
Here’s what the researchers discovered: barely one-fifth (21%) of employees are truly engaged in their work, in the sense that they would “go the extra mile” for their employer. Nearly four out of ten (38%) are mostly or entirely disengaged, while the rest are in the tepid middle. There’s no way to sugarcoat it—this data represents a stinging indictment of the legacy management practices found in most companies."
And then Jon Husband wrote a follow up post on why one of the core objectives of E2.0 has to be employee engagement -
http://tinyurl.com/ycps74d
This is one of the reasons any sort of change is difficult in enterprises - not impossible but definitely difficult. But this is a very very disturbing statistic - "barely one-fifth (21%) of employees are truly engaged in their work, in the sense that they would “go the extra mile” for their employer."
Are there any India specific studies that you know of in this area? Unless people are engaged at work and passionate and willing to be lifelong learners - any change management strategy will produce very shallow ripples. I agree with Hamel that we need fundamentally different management practices in the 21st century.